Darth Dawkins Unanswered Questions

 

     

SHARE 

List of questions from 10 years ago on Paltalk that Darth Dawkins still has not answered.till has not answered

1. how can the claim that "God is good” not be a mere tautology if the “good” is defined in terms of God’s nature?
2. how is the Euthyphro dilemma a "false dichotomy"?
3. what is the (magical) barrier that demarcates “micro-evolution” from “macro-evolution”?
4. how can skeptical theism be an adequate response to the evidential argument from evil since skeptical theism logically entails a commitment to global skepticism?
5. what is an example of an observation that could falsify the hypotheses of an Intelligent Designer, a Special Creator, a Fine-Tuner of the cosmological constants, or of God?
6. if these hypotheses cannot be falsified, how can there be evidence for them?
7. what is the formal argument constituting the “design inference” to the existence of God?
8. what hypothesis is a better explanation for the apparently structured diversity of terrestrial life than the hypothesis of a universal common ancestor?
9. is the hypothesis of a universal common ancestor an unfalsifiable hypothesis?
10. is the hypothesis of a universal common ancestor a falsified hypothesis? what observation has falsified it?
11. is the hypothesis of a universal common ancestor an ad hoc hypothesis?
12. Is the hypothesis of a universal common ancestor a logically incoherent hypothesis?
13. What way is there to discredit an explanatory hypothesis other than to show that it is unfalsifiable, that it has been falsified, that it is ad hoc, that it is logically incoherent or that there is an alternative hypothesis that has greater explanatory virtues?
14. If “atemporal change” is an “oxymoron” because it is is equivalent to the concept of “no-change change”, how can change not “presuppose” or “require” time?
15. What mathematicians or philosophers have shown that “actual infinities” are impossible and by what argument(s) have they shown this?
16. How is the regularity of nature an explanatory hypothesis “that explains the way things are”? If predictions are derivable from the mere assumption of the regularity of nature, how is it the thesis is not falsified if what is predicted fails to come true? if the thesis can be falsified then it’s falsifiable, so how can the regularity of nature be falsifiable and unfalsifiable, simultaneously?

This is a list of questions that have been presented to Darth Dawkins repeatedly but he has refused to answer. These questions could be presented to any creationist in a debate.

stupidcreationists.com

This Section has been reserved for Darth to respond to the questions presented on this site. So far the only response we have gotten is that he has answered these questions many times in the chat rooms. He refuses to put his "responses" into a written statement and no one seems to have witnessed him actually responding on mic.

STILL BLANK...what a shock!

DARTH DAWKINS FACEBOOK GROUP
https://www.facebook.com/groups/DarthDawkins

DARTH DAWKINS FACEBOOK GROUP

DARTH QUESTIONS SAVED ON ON ARCHIVE.COM

TJump Destroyed In Philosophy Debate About Platonism

Tjump gets destroyed in philosophy debate with Godless. Tjump gets exposed for being confused about what Platonism is and says language does not exist. Godless has to teach Tom Jump that Platonism holds that abstract objects exist.

Modern Day Debate Full video: https://youtu.be/vHaKlPDxElI

What Is Platonism? Video: https://youtu.be/NkgfBCmAXMo

Platonism in Metaphysics:
Platonism is the view that there exist such things as abstract objects — where an abstract object is an object that does not exist in space or time and which is therefore entirely non-physical and non-mental.



Tjump Wiki Page



Godless Discord Server

Matt Dillahunty Dodge

 

The Dillahunty dodge is a term invented by Matt Slick in order to describe dishonest tactics for evading questions weilded by Matt Dillahunty.

Dillahunty exposes his inconsistency by appealing to Hume’s problem of induction when denying arguments for God, but subjectively dismisses the problem when supporting naturalism, evolution, etc. He thereby routinely commits the fallacy of special pleading…

His ultimate objection to virtually all arguments for the Biblical worldview is ‘the third option appeal’ (aka ‘The Dillahunty Dodge’), which goes something like this: ‘There could be another explanation we’re not aware of; I don’t know’. Thus, he will deny everything we do know and jump to nonsensical appeals to the unknown. This is a self defeating approach to knowledge as a whole, as it can just as easily be applied to virtually everything that Dillahunty himself claims to know. E.g., if and when Dillahunty asserts that ‘evolution is true’ we can dismiss all (supposed) evidence for it, not with rational arguments, but instead with the third option appeal: ‘There could be another explanation for what you believe is explained by evolution that we’re not aware of; I don’t know’. We could (ultimately) postulate a third option for virtually any truth claim, ad infinitum. If and when Dillahunty objects by stating that we know of nothing else that is better supported by the evidence, we can call his objection an ‘argument from ignorance’ (vs. an argument based upon what he does claim knowledge of) — just as he objects to the statement that we know of no other means by which logic could be derived apart from mind. If Dillahunty appeals to inductive inference to support naturalism and evolution, then in the interest of consistency and rationality he must agree that inductive inference points to conceptual laws of thought.
Thus, the irrationality, hypocrisy (special pleading) and indeed impossibility of Matt Dillahunty’s atheistic worldview is reasonably demonstrated.
Dillahunty Hang Up Tactic
Often while taking calls on the Atheist Experience rather than exert the effort to do the Dillahunty Dodge Matt will just get angry and hang up on callers.

Godless Debate Community Wiki

TJump Moral Theory

TJump just came into the Enlightenment Discord server to debate his odd moral theory that the imposition of will is immoral and descriptive. He asserts that morality is objective. Tjump calls himself a Moral Objectivist and defines immoral as whatever is an involuntary imposition on one's will. Which he admit entails if a rock imposes on your will then the rock is immoral.

Tom's position on morality being objective caught the attention of Philosophy Alex Malpass who wrote a blog post about him.e

What’s strange though is that Tom Jump does believe that morality can exist in an empty room. That somehow objective morality can be a trait of physical matter in some way shape or form. He believes moral laws exist in the same way that gravity is a law. Tjump claimed he was quoting out the Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy but no philosophers hold his position.

Jump thinks that morality is objective, in a similar way to physical laws. Objective in this context means that it exists independently of any minds. We take physical laws, like the law of gravitation, to obtain in the universe just as much whether there are any minds present or not. If a moral law is objective, then it too would obtain just as well without any minds in existence.

His idea is that objective morality is defined in relation to the notion of involuntary impositions.

So this entails: S: if action phi is F then phi is immoral’. Suppose that F is filled out by some mental characteristic, eg, contrary to desires, and that S is considered an ordinary conditional statement, eg, S is not a counterfactual. In that case, S might be true even if there are no minds. At worlds where there are no minds, S is trivially true. At worlds where there are minds, S is true if actions contrary to desires are immoral.

This definition of immorality involves voluntariness, which in turn involves rationality, which itself involves the notion of beliefs about immorality, and the whole thing becomes a circle. We were offered a definition of immorality which in turn used the notion of immorality.

I wonder if Tom Jump would argue in favour of suing ones own biological mother for not having aborted the individual as a fetus because of the subjective experience of having a miserable life or life at all, because his biological mother him "into this universe where many things occur which we do not will nor consent to.

Alex Malpass Article On TJump

TJump Wiki Page

Leila Discord Love Triangle With Jovonn And Tom Unboxes

Leila has always lead on that she has a great marriage. She would never speak ill of her husband and even brags about sex with him when she is drunk. People never believed it however due to the shear amount of time she spent on discord and the odd romance she had with Tom Unboxes while with her husband. A 40 year old jobless homeless Asian. Leila is 23. Although it was strictly internet flirting at the time its hard to make the argument that spending years around a guy you have a weird crush on didn't have an affect on your relationship. Jonjon for example would consistently point out that Leila must have a shitty marriage given various reasons that most people agreed with. After awhile Tom and Leila had a falling out which leads to Tom Unboxes telling Leila to "GET THE FUCK OUT" of his server. This crushes Leila as she has always defended Tom. During this time JoVonn was also having a falling out with Tom so both Leila and JoVonn left toms. (They both are currently suffering from the Tom Abuse Amnesia Syndrome)

Come to find out however JoVonn and Leila started another server and just hung out with a few of their friends. After awhile they returned but exhibited odd behavior. Such as leaving and joining the room at the same time. Leila laughing at anything JoVonn says. One instance in particular was very telling. During an incident with Leila and Rainy, Rainy told Leila "why don't you just leave and call your boyfriend JoVonn" Leila responds with "I WILL" then Leila leaves and directly after JoVonn leaves. However whenever JoVonn was asked he would deny any relationship. At this time Leila was still married to her husband. After awhile Leila and JoVonn seemingly reconcile with Tom. During this time however Leila was drinking a lot. She came into the room and announced she is getting a divorce and that its a secret. She additionally states that its the fault of her "babysitter". Shortly after JoVonn enters the room and pulls Leila out the room. This increases the speculations that JoVonn was the cause of the divorce.

Some time passes and JoVonn starts drinking heavily and rumors surface of an affair between JoVonn and Leila with possible interference from Tom in their relationship. JoVonn starts lashing out at Tom publicly. Rumors also say that he was talking to people privately cryptically referring to Julius Caesar. The reference being that a trusted friend back stabbed him. Dionysus eventually makes a Video stating he has PROOF of a sexual relationship between Leila and JoVonn. This video has since been deleted. He states he has multiple sources none of which were JoVonn. One piece of evidence was a screenshot of Vic and Yuri discussing JoVonn and Leila meeting in person to have sex which was accidentally posted in a travel channel with Dionysus. Another was when he bluffed to Leila and Leila confirmed it to him but said he doesnt know the full story. Dionysus concludes Leila and JoVonn had an affair which lead to the divorce and then Tom found out, got jealous and started interfering.

Leila then leaves JoVonn for Tom and literally triples the number of partners shes has had in a months time. Eventually Alex admits to blackmailing JoVonn. This leads JoVonn and Tom to start arguing publicly about it. Basically confirming the rumors during the course of it. Leila has since left discord in fear of it being brought up to her. Shamos still brings it up occasionally and however JoVonn still is maintaining nothing happened (presumably to protect Leila).

Leila Wiki Page

Jovonn Wiki Page

Godless and Leila Discord Fight About Tom Unboxes

*Tom Unboxes vs Godless Drama Summary*

Tom Abuse Amnesia Syndrome

About half the atheist community on Discord suffers from the Tom Abuse Amnesia Syndrome. About 60% of the community has been repeatedly mod abused and/or banned unjustly from Tom Unboxes. 100% of the community has repeatedly witnessed others become victims of Tom Rabbittt and his mod regime. 

The Tom Abuse Amnesia Syndrome is a phenomena in our community where almost every victim of Tom Unboxes either forgets that the abuse occurred at all or after some time comes to believe what they use to view as abuse was actually justified.

The phenemona involves the inability to recall dramatic events that would not typically be lost with ordinary forgetting. The amnesia appears to be caused by traumatic or stressful experiences endured or witnessed on Discord.

Most members are partly or completely unaware that they have gaps in their memory. They become aware only when they return to the server and the abuse happens again and is lost or when circumstances make them aware—eg, when others tell them or ask them about events they cannot remember.

Examples Of Known Cases

Jovonn is the most severe case of the phenomena having had recovered and relapsed the most times. Banned more times than anyone can count and suffered some of the most extreme abuse in Tom Unboxes Server he holds the record for being the person who has suffered from the amnesia, then returned to the server and abused again temporarily regaining the ability to recall the past only to relapse have the amnesia return. Ironically Jovonn is currently banned from Tom Unboxes but is attempting to get Tom Rabbittt to allow him to rejoin.

Pogan is an interesting case. Pogan has been mod abused and banned multiple times in Tom Unboxes. There was one incident where Tom Rabbittt made Pogan humiliate himself by saying the word "PANCAKE" in order to not be banned. Although Pogan knows he will be abused and banned in Tom Unboxes he still returns every time. His most recent fallout with Tom Unboxes server was because he got angry because one of his messages was deleted from the text chat. Mysteriously he was surprised and shocked that a mod in the server would delete a text message unjustly. Pogan actually referred the censorship as "abuse" although he believes the his previous trauma such as being bullied, gaslighted and publically humiliated was not abuse. He revolted against the mild censorship by creating his own Discord Server the replacement Modus Ponens.

**IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE WELLBEING OF SOMEONE WHO IS RETURNING SUFFERING FROM TOM ABUSE AMNESIA SYNDROME AND HAS DECIDED TO RETURN THE SERVER PLEASE REFER THEM TO TOM RABBITTT DRAMA SAGE YOUTUBE PLAYLIST

CLICK HERE FOR TOM UNBOXES DISCORD SERVER ABUSE HISTORY

Atheist Community Of Austin Discord Server

The ACA has a subreddit and a Discord Server. The third wave feminists have taken over the Discord chat.

The Atheist Community of Austin(ACA) is a non-profit organization, founded in 1996, based in Austin, Texas. Their goal is to promote positive atheism and the separation of church and state. Matt Dillahunty is the current president of the ACA since 2019.
The ACA sponsors a weekly Austin-based webcast and cable access television show. The Atheist Experience is hosted by Matt Dillahunty, and is a discussion show inviting calls from the viewers. The show is streamed over the Internet, offered as a podcast, and clips are unofficially posted to YouTube. A line is reserved for Austin callers, and theists are encouraged to participate in the show - so long they have better arguments than "open your heart to Jaysus and yawl see that he's real!" The Atheist Experience airs each Sunday from 16:30 to 18:00 Central Time.

The ACA Discord is now controlled by crazy feminists and the male moderators are silenced.

ACA Discord Controlled By Third Wave Feminism

Female In ACA Discord Server "

I have deliberately broken Discord rules in text chat in front of him since then and he just ignores it. He is too afraid to use his moderator power on me. It's so fucked up!! I feel kind of sorry for the guy but what more effective way to wake people up?"

ACA Discord Server Invite Link: https://discord.gg/Szwugqb

Some people have suggested that third wave feminism could qualify as a religion under some anthropologists' definitions. However, regardless of this, the people who identify as feminists are bound to believe in some type of bullshit as the whole concept of being a feminist relies heavily upon the concepts of victim complexes and self-guilt.

ACA Official Website

Female Feminist Atheists Tell Me To Fuck Off

I went into a Subreddit called GodlessWomen to ask them their opinion on the false Sexual Assault Allegations in the atheist community and the #MeToo Movement.

Immediately four of the female atheist feminists told me to fuck off.

Screen Shot Of Me Confronting My Fellow Female Atheists On Reddit About False Sexual Assault Allegations In The Atheist Community:

This is what I posted "I think the female atheists should speak out against these mass amounts of false accusations of sexual assault in the atheist community. Atheists like Richard Carrier, Neil Degrass Tyson, Michael Shermer and David Silverman are having their careers ruined over baseless allegations."

Godless Reddit Account

If there is no evidence then the accused is innocent. To give credence to an accusation/theory etc merely because it is articulated is not a true skeptical approach. It is a cynical approach allowing the individual to use their own personal desires or selfish bias alone to decide the truth. The basis of our legal system is NOT that the accused must prove that he is innocent but that the accuser MUST PROVE that the accused is guilty. There by if saying that the accused is guilty only on the basis of being accused by some one who very likely has something to gain from it is just wrong. This very basis works in favor of the accuser to protect them from defamation suits as the accused then becomes the accuser by saying they were "damaged" in someway, and now MUST PROVE the how why and often intent. More often if there is no evidence that it did happen then there is no evidence that it didn't. Which leads us back to those pesky personal desires and selfish bias. Which is why these types of accusations SHOULD NEVER be trialled in the court of public opinion. Which is what the left and their feminists love to do. 

Rebecca Vitsmum Sexual Assault Accusation Against David Silverman

Crazy Feminist Atheist

Rebecca Vitsum accused David Silverman touching her sacrum without her permission, her thoughts about the matter and her court hearing endeavoring to get a restraining order against David Silverman.

Rebecca claimed she had an orgasm she couldn't control 😊when David touched her back summarized by Brett Keane in this video:

Silverman contends that he did not inappropriately touch Rebecca Vitsmun. 

David Silverman's Response To Allegation On His Website

https://firebrandforgood.com/metoo/

Rebecca Vitsmun filed a restraining order against Silverman, but the judge denied her petition because the judge did not see a pattern of sexual harassment against her by Silverman. However, Vitsmun has filed a battery charge against Silverman with the police.

Rebecca Vitsmun has filed a battery allegation with the police against atheist David Silverman and indicates he caressed her sacrum without her permission (the sacrum is a bone at the base of the lower back that is above the tailbone) Dogma Debate interview audio clip with the female atheist who accused David Silverman of sexual assualt.

Rebecca Vitsmum says she was "involuntary sexually aroused" when David touched her back

Rebecca set up David Silverman. I believe that because he did not act inappropriate, which I believe was there the girls intent was to get him to a party and witnessed him behaving and appropriately there for backing up the other two complaints because she personally knows those women. I believe since nothing happened inappropriately at the party at the two were left to devise something that occurred well remember when he rubbed your back or touched your back or whatever will have to go with that one. I do believe at some point she started to believe her story I do not believe that at the intent was there and you must have been tense shit for it to be an assault. I believe that Rebecca is ruining she is part of the problem with me to movement. She's overly dramatic present signs of borderline personality which would back up the fact that she's had some trauma in her past, I have no doubt that she has. Just because somebody has had trouble in the past is not means everybody comes in contact with you when you appear to be crippled and needing help when somebody walks up to you and ask if you need help and touches you her turning that into a sexual salt and making such a big deal about it should be a crime.

ACA Discord Server Slaves To Women

My ACA Discord Server Experience

I went into the Atheist Community Of Austin Discord server and started talking about how fucked up it was that the atheist movement had been taking over by crazy feminists. I think the female atheists should speak out against these mass amounts of false accusations of sexual assault in the atheist community. Atheists like Richard Carrier, Neil Degrass Tyson, Michael Shermer and David Silverman are having their careers ruined over baseless allegations. Men are afraid to oppose it because they are afraid of being accused themselves.

So in the ACA Discord server I was talking about American Atheists firing David Silverman and a male moderator muted me for "being inflammatory". It was a small voice chat with only 2 other males. I was so annoyed with the male atheist moderator for silencing me when it was people like him who I was speaking out for. 

So I said to him "I noticed in the "skeptic" community all it takes is a woman's accusation of sexual assault to destroy a man's career and life. No further evidence necessary. So if you use your moderator powers to mute me again in this Discord server I will go shout to all the other admins and moderators that you were sexually harassing me in voice chat. Then you will not be a moderator here any longer."

The male moderator was silent for a long time and then responded "Can I get that in writing?" Seems like an odd response but I think he was stunned and speechless so it was just occurred to him to say in order to try to get some evidence that I was lying or something. The other 2 males in the room didn't say anything. When he asked me that I screamed "Stop harrassing me!!" and he left the voice chat. Then he typed in the General Chat that he gave me my text chat privileges back and signed offline!

Now every time I join a chat he is in he quickly exists. I have deliberately broken Discord rules in text chat in front of him since then and he just ignores it. He is too afraid to use his moderator power on me. It's so fucked up!! I feel kind of sorry for the guy but what more effective way to wake people up?

David Silverman was accused of "sexual assault" by 3 different female atheist crazy feminists. One of which was Matt Dillahunty's ex-wife Beth Presswood

I do think when evil Men like Dillahunty who aid feminism in poisoning the Atheist Community they deserve to be victim's of false allegations. Actually it is really funny. David Silverman became a victim only after he helped Feminists take over. I told him so in a Q&A on Discord:

What ever happened to Beth Presswood?

https://medium.com/@godlessvideos/beth-presswood-feminist-atheist-monster-1dda7becebb1

Intelligent Design Argument Jack Angstreich vs Creationist

Intelligent design debate on Discord. Jack Angstreich vs Creationist argument about the definition of complexity in DNA and whether or not irreducible complexity would be evidence for a god or evidence against evolution. Creationism and Evolution is presented as a dichotomy.

Does the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism Defeat God's Beliefs

My Philosophy Paper on Plantinga's EAAN got published 😀

Alvin Plantinga has famously argued that the naturalist who accepts evolutionary theory has a defeater for all of her beliefs, including her belief in naturalism and evolution. Hence, he says, naturalism, when conjoined with evolution, is self-defeating and cannot be rationally accepted. This is known as the evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN).  If the EAAN is framed in terms of objective probability and theism is assumed to be non-contingent, then either theism is necessarily false or the EAAN is unsound. Neither option is attractive to the proponent of the EAAN. Perry Hendricks (Religious Studies 1-5, 2018) has responded to Wunder's criticism, showing that the EAAN can be salvaged and, indeed, strengthened, by framing it in terms not of naturalism (N), but of a proposition that is entailed by N that is also consistent with theism. We will show that once Hendricks' solution to Wunder's objection is accepted, a puzzle ensues: if the EAAN provides the naturalist with a defeater for all of her beliefs, then an extension of it appears to provide God with a defeater for all of his beliefs. After bringing out this puzzle, we suggest several ways in which the proponent of the EAAN might solve it, but also show some potential weaknesses in these purported solutions.

Download here: 

https://www.academia.edu/43436853/Does_the_Evolutionary_Argument_Against_Naturalism_Defeat_Gods_Beliefs

I went into the Frank Turek Cross-examined Facebook Group and the first 2 people that tried to respond resorted to claiming that God doesn't have beliefs! 😀

https://www.facebook.com/groups/CrossExamined.org/permalink/715965539205630/

Steve Mcrae Blog Post To Aronra Definition Agnosticism

 

Aronra Strawmanning Habit

I am reading an old blog post by Steve Mrcrae  who is the owner of the Great Debate Community. He keeps responding to Aronra where he is frustrated after repeatedly telling Aronra he doesn't believe lack of belief is the same thing as believing it is false. This was after they had multiple interactions in their disagreement over the definition of Agnosticism.

Aronra has a nasty habit of strawmanning repeatedly. He did this with Eric Hernandez and recently with me.

Steve Mrae To Aronra on GDC Blog:

"Aron you keep strawmanning me…like every time. Even other people tell you that you are strawmanning me as they can easily see it…I have NEVER said ~Bp is the same as B~p, lack of belief is NOT the same as believing p is false. NEVER would I make such a puerile mistake and yet you keep insisting I make such a silly claim I do not, nor have I ever made. Nor have I ever said that there is a position between being convinced and being not convinced. This is a dichotomy, Bp V ~Bp there is NO middle ground here in classical logic…so please stop saying I believe things that I do not believe.

People notice you continually making these false accusations of my positions which they infer means you either do not understand what people are saying nor do you seem to want to honestly fix your misconceptions.

If you strawman me on this again, claiming I believe things that I simply do not, nor have I ever, believed I will refer you back to this post as I don’t see how I can be any more clearer on this." 

Aron Ra Gumball Atheism vs Steve Mcrae

Great Debate Community Blog

Jack Angstreich Cinemania

https://nypost.com/2003/05/15/the-reel-dark-world-of-cinematic-freaks/

Jack was noticed by the public before becoming noteworthy for his Darth Dawkins attacks. He starred in a documentary called Cinemania

Angstreich sees up to three films a day, carefully studying the schedules of film houses like Anthology Archive and Film Forum, working out what’s unmissable and what isn’t, and structuring a detailed timetable on his home computer.

Jack Angstreich is one of the stars of Cinemania, a 2002 documentary by Stephen Kijak & Angela Christlieb about New York film buffs, each on their own obsessive daily quest to track down and view multiple film screenings around the city.

https://soundcloud.com/user-998370388/darths-impression-of-jacks-movie-experience

Beth Presswood Feminist Liar

Beth Presswood Crazy Atheist Feminist

Famous For Nothing

Beth Presswood is an unattractive, unintelligent dumb female atheist with no personality. Nobody would know who she was or care if she hadn't married Matt Dillahunty. With him running the Atheist Experience and ex-president of the Atheist Community Of Austin she was able to get her own Podcast called Godless Bitches to spew her Third Wave Feminist garbage.

Presswood Abusing Youtube Censorship:

Beth Presswood wants to hide information and videos being spread against her false allegations against David Silverman. She has launched a campaign where anytime someone makes a video with her name she reports to Youtube and gets the video taken down for "violation of privacy" You have to go to other sites such as Bitchute to see videos about her.

Banned From Youtube Beth Presswood vs David Silverman video on Bitchute

Feminist Poison

Over the years she helped feminism poison atheism and it got to the point where in the "Skeptic Community" all it took for a man to be considered guilty of sexual assault was for a woman to claim it.

Famous Male Atheist Leaders who at one point supported feminism had their careers destroyed because of false allegations. Lawrence Krauss, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Michael Shermer and David Silverman.

Beth Presswood targeted David Silverman. Beth Presswood got David Silverman fired from American atheists with false allegations of sexual assault. She is an evil vile third wave feminist that hates men. Silverman was fired from American Atheists.

GODLESS GIRL QUESTIONS DAVID SILVERMAN ACCUSING HIM OF DESERVING THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS FOR HELPING THE FEMINISTS 😀

David Silverman gives his account on his Website of evil Beth

Silverman "My memory of that night is very different from what she reported, Once again, I had enthusiastic consent, with precursory communications that established a safe word and set boundaries. Our interaction/play spanned several hours and several people witnessed our flirtations and some interactions. One person mentioned R’s lipstick smeared on my face, another that commented to R to fix her smeared lipstick, and still another person asked us both if she could join us in a threesome." 

Silverman quotes Presswood as saying during the sexual encounter “Call me a whore.  I used to be a prostitute and need to be shamed for it”  –Beth Presswood and asked him to spit in her mouth

https://firebrandforgood.com/metoo/

Matt Dillahunty Calls Silverman A Piece Of Shit: 

Beth Presswood Feminist Accomplice

Silverman was also accused by Rebecca Vitsmum of sexual assault for touching her back. This is how crazy she sounds: 

Rebecca Vitsmum Responds (Audio Only) David Silverman

Beth Presswood Wiki Page